Porous SnO2/layered titanate nanohybrid with enhanced electrochemical performance for reversible lithium storage

Porous SnO2/layered titanate nanohybrid with enhanced electrochemical performance for reversible lithium storage:
Chem. Commun., 2012, Advance Article
DOI: 10.1039/C1CC14769B, Communication
Joo-Hee Kang, Seung-Min Paek, Jin-Ho Choy
Porous heterostructure of SnO2-layered titanate nanohybrid has been synthesized via an exfoliation/reassembling process. This hybridization gives rise to a remarkable enhancement of discharge capacity with a good capacity retention.
To cite this article before page numbers are assigned, use the DOI form of citation above.
The content of this RSS Feed (c) The Royal Society of Chemistry
(Via Science JournalFeeds)
Related articles
Enhanced by Zemanta

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Panasonic to begin mass-production of long-life Li-ion battery system for solar-powered homes in Europe

Image
Panasonic to begin mass-production of long-life Li-ion battery system for solar-powered homes in Europe : Panasonic Corporation will begin mass- production this month of a compact, secure and long-life lithium-ion battery system the company has developed for European homes. This marks the first time for the company to produce in volume such a system designed for Europe. The lithium-ion battery system consists of the Panasonic battery module with nominal capacity of 1.35 kWh and a battery management system designed to control charge and discharge of the battery in accordance with customer needs. The battery system stores excess energy generated from the photovoltaic (PV) power system during peak hours of PV generation and discharges the energy as needed, providing a solution as a household battery storage system that helps self-consumption of solar-generated power. It will also enable households to reduce the dependence on grid power and facilitate the further spread of green ener
Read more

Short notes on Open Access, Peer review & (insane) publications

Image
This is insane! As a long term peer reviewer I read all articles (not only under review) very carefully. From relatively wide observation the only half of the submitted papers might be accepted for further publication. Not counting in this half the articles which need some (more or less) modifications. Indeed, there are almost half of the articles which went through my hands have a very low quality. These include repeating/copying someone else's research, very poor understanding of the obtained results, not willingness, even to try to explain the obtained results, but just referring to previously published articles (from other researchers)  (which means their result is not unique). Since I do not connect with the publishers other than by e-mail as a reviewer or author, I do not know how busy are Journals is to feel the issues. However, I understand that the publishers have to earn some money from what they are doing. Good it or not (very much) for the progress is a big question
Read more