Well-dispersed bi-component-active CoO/CoFe2O4 nanocomposites with tunable performances as anode materials for lithium-ion batteries

Well-dispersed bi-component-active CoO/CoFe2O4 nanocomposites with tunable performances as anode materials for lithium-ion batteries:
Chem. Commun., 2012, Advance Article
DOI: 10.1039/C1CC15322F, Communication
Meixia Li, Ya-Xia Yin, Congju Li, Fazhi Zhang, Li-Jun Wan, Sailong Xu, David G. Evans
CoO/CoFe2O4 nanocomposites, calcined from hydrotalcite precursors, exhibit tunable cycle performances and rate capabilities underlain by well-dispersed bi-component active phases.
To cite this article before page numbers are assigned, use the DOI form of citation above.
The content of this RSS Feed (c) The Royal Society of Chemistry
(Via RSC - Chem. Commun. latest articles)
Related articles
Enhanced by Zemanta

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Panasonic to begin mass-production of long-life Li-ion battery system for solar-powered homes in Europe

Image
Panasonic to begin mass-production of long-life Li-ion battery system for solar-powered homes in Europe : Panasonic Corporation will begin mass- production this month of a compact, secure and long-life lithium-ion battery system the company has developed for European homes. This marks the first time for the company to produce in volume such a system designed for Europe. The lithium-ion battery system consists of the Panasonic battery module with nominal capacity of 1.35 kWh and a battery management system designed to control charge and discharge of the battery in accordance with customer needs. The battery system stores excess energy generated from the photovoltaic (PV) power system during peak hours of PV generation and discharges the energy as needed, providing a solution as a household battery storage system that helps self-consumption of solar-generated power. It will also enable households to reduce the dependence on grid power and facilitate the further spread of green ener...
Read more

Short notes on Open Access, Peer review & (insane) publications

Image
This is insane! As a long term peer reviewer I read all articles (not only under review) very carefully. From relatively wide observation the only half of the submitted papers might be accepted for further publication. Not counting in this half the articles which need some (more or less) modifications. Indeed, there are almost half of the articles which went through my hands have a very low quality. These include repeating/copying someone else's research, very poor understanding of the obtained results, not willingness, even to try to explain the obtained results, but just referring to previously published articles (from other researchers)  (which means their result is not unique). Since I do not connect with the publishers other than by e-mail as a reviewer or author, I do not know how busy are Journals is to feel the issues. However, I understand that the publishers have to earn some money from what they are doing. Good it or not (very much) for the progress is a big question...
Read more